Posts Tagged ‘ Avengers ’

Fetch me a Norse! My Thor review

Chris Hemsworth as Thor as depicted in the upc...

Image via Wikipedia

Released: Out now

Certificate: 12A

Director: Kenneth Branagh

Cast: Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, Stellan Skarsgars, Idris Elba

Running Time: 114 minutes

Plot (Possible spoilers): Arrogant Norse god Thor (Hemsworth) is cast out of Asgard by his father Odin (Hopkins), whilst his evil brother (Hidleston) plots to steal his fathers throne. Thor must rediscover himself on Earth in order to return to him homeland and save the day.

If you like your superhero movies fun and linear then Thor is right up your alley. If you’re searching for something a little more wholesome, than you might be disappointed with Marvel’s latest studio flick. What the film is however, is proof Marvel have learned from their mistakes. After Iron Man 2 was nothing more than a complete disappointment, often trying to cram in too many story lines just to set up The Avengers, Thor is the complete opposite. The movie moves through at an unbelievably quick pace and never fails to deliver. Thor is action packed and a tremendous amount of fun, showcasing how the master of Shakespeare Kenneth Branagh was the perfect man for the Norse god of Thunder.

Thor was considered to be Marvel’s most difficult task on the road to next year’s Avengers movie. Get him right and you have this awe inspiring powerful Norse god, with a rich and tremendous back-story. Get him wrong and you have nothing more than an embarrassing showcase of why B-list heroes should be left alone. Marvel has played it safe with Hamlet Kenneth Branagh, as he keeps Thor fresh and exciting all the way through.

Without spoiling too much of the plot, the story revolves around Thor and his relationship with his brother Loki and father Odin. After Loki convinces Thor to disobey his father’s orders, Thor is banished to Earth to learn to error of his ways and return to Asgard to stop his evil brother’s plans. It’s traditional Todorov narrative in its purest form and that’s what makes it so fun and compelling.

The movie begins with a bang in New Mexico showcasing Thor’s arrival on Earth followed by a scene illustrating the intense history between Asgard and Jotunheim (land of the frost giants). The Jotunheim scene leaps at you as if it were the great battle for Middle Earth at the beginning of The Fellowship of the Ring. Not very original I’m afraid. Plus the 3-D spoils it.

We then meet the key players in the film, Odin, (played by Antony Hopkins), Thor (played by the Chris Hemsworth) and his dark and mysterious brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston). The relationship between the characters themselves is handled perfectly. You can really tell Shakespearean director Branagh is onboard here. The relationship between Thor and his brother Loki is a complicated one. You can see the characters respect each other, but that is clouded by jealousy, rage and ultimately betrayal. This film is ultimately the platform for Hemsworth to imitate what Iron Man did for Robert Downey Jr. and become a major star. Hemsworth owns the role of Thor, and his transformation from arrogant warrior to selfless hero is handled perfectly. The linear narrative does wonders here. The fish out of water scenes also work perfectly as well, providing some fantastic comedic moments. (Especially one scene where Thor storms into a pet shop a demands a horse). Similar to the scenes involving Clark Kent in the Christopher Reeve Superman films, Hemsworth proves he is good with drama, action and comedy.

It’s Thor’s brother Loki who steals the show however. Hiddleston’s portrayal as the God of Mischief makes for one of the best comic book movie villains of all time. Branagh has done what so many comic book movies fail to do and spend equal time setting up the moves villain. Loki is a complex fellow. After discovering secrets about his origin, he has a fantastic showdown with his father Odin, with emotions of jealousy, rage, love and regret flying all over the place. This could of all gone wrong but Branagh keeps the tension thick, and the drama flowing. It’s so easy to sympathize for Loki, but Hiddleston keeps you hating him as well. His ability to keep the audience guessing is a skill that Hollywood seems to have neglected over the years.  Co-stars Hemsworth and Hiddleston have fantastic chemistry on screen, and make for one of the best hero/villain match ups we’ve seen in a long time.

The rest of the main cast all impress. Hopkins gives a powerful performance as the all father Odin, bringing with him an incredible sense of authority whenever he’s on screen. Unlike her role in Black Swan, Natalie Portman keeps it simple but effective as scientist Jane Foster. She oozes of innocence and woos Thor at an incredibly quick pace (which some critics have pointed out) but considering all she does for him while he’s on Earth, it’s pretty believable. Fresh off the controversy surrounding his casting, Idris Elba does a wonderful job as Heimdall, protector of the Bifrost Bridge (a bridge which links all the realms together). Heimdall’s incredible physique puts even Thor to shame

It’s the supporting cast that let the film down a bit however. Ray Stevenson, Tadanobu Asano and Josh Dallas rarely get given any sort of character development as Thor’s friends, the Warriors Three. The relationship between Thor and Asgard’s female warrior Sif (Jaimie Alaxendar) is never really explored and her character is left in the ambiguous wilderness. The same can be said for Kat Dennings as her character Darcy Lewis, a friend and colleague of Jane Foster (Portman), fails to deliver the sort of comedy we predicted from the film’s trailer. I can’t help but think this film would have been at least half a star better if all of the characters were handled perfectly.

The 3-D effect has been criticised (with the exception of Avatar) for not really taking off in cinemas yet and sadly the same applies to Thor. The opening scenes were left blurry and I didn’t really see what the 3-D effect gave to the film. If anything, it was a minor inconvenience.  The special effects were passable but let the film down in some scenes, especially the scene involving Thor and The Destroyer. I could forgive this however as they didn’t distract from the incredible action (and yes there is a lot of action) and drama nevertheless. There’s also one really pointless cameo from Jeremy Renner as the archer avenger Hawkeye where he shows up for almost no reason.

Verdict: Kenneth Branagh has done an incredible job with Thor, creating a standalone film that oozes with charisma. Hemsworth and Hiddleston emerge from this as true stars, and I can only hope we see more of their relationship in next year’s Avengers movie. Move over Iron Man, there’s a new hero in town, at least until Captain America: The First Avenger hits in July.

No pressure for Chris Evans..

****

Franchise Overkill?

Comic Civil War

I was watching a video over at comic book movie recently and it had Chris Evans (The man playing Captain America in this year’s Marvel Studios film Captain America: The First Avenger) talk about his picture deal with Marvel. According to Evans, he has signed a six-picture deal, which means he’ll do three Cap movies and three Avengers flicks.

Now obviously this is dependent on whether the Cap film flops when it is released in July, if it does it could cause a major reshuffle in plans for the Avengers movie. If the Cap movie does relatively well, we are likely to see Chris Evans as Cap at least six times in the next ten to twelve years.

Add that to Iron Man 3 (directed by Shane Black) scheduled for 2013 and at least one Thor sequel; you have the three major players in the Avengers franchise having nine individual movies in 11 years time. I’m all for the Iron Man franchise, as I believe the series will flourish once more now the Avengers is up and running. But Thor and Cap trilogies are pushing it.

A movie based on a character that was invented for American propaganda is unlikely to make it past one outing in my opinion. Even Marvel has realised the Cap franchise is a risky property by changing the name of the film in some European countries. If the movie bombs and Marvel still pushes ahead with Cap sequels, you’re lively to see either two things. One of them being a completely unmotivated, unconvincing Chris Evans probably realising he’s made the biggest mistake of his life, or a new cheaper actor in the role of Steve Rogers. Marvel have shown their not afraid to drop their big names (Ed Norton anyone?), and I wouldn’t be surprised if Evans was next in their line of fire if the Cap movie bombs.

Thor is slightly different however. I think of Thor as very similar to the original Christopher Reeve Superman franchise. Like Reeve, Chris Hemsworth sells the fish of water aspect of his character beautifully, but there’s only so far that can go. The Superman franchise showed us that the humour of being an outsider wears of quickly, and in Superman Return‘s case, actually becomes embarrassing. Plus I don’t think Thor has the strength in characters like Iron Man or Spider-Man. We can’t just have Thor vs. his brother Loki in every solo film (especially since Loki is rumoured to be the villain in the Avengers). But where else could you go with Thor? If I were Marvel I’d hold off Thor sequels and keep the character exclusive to the Avengers franchise, just to keep Thor fresh.

I think Marvel need to be very careful with bombarding comic book movies on audiences. Whilst comic book movies have a much loyal fan base, I doubt many movie goers will be rushing to see rumoured upcoming projects such as The Black Widow, War Machine, Namor: The Sub Mariner, Luke Cage and a Nick Fury/Shield movie.

Marvel should learn from Fox’s mistakes and take time with their movies. Comic book movies are at an all time high, but if you push too many films down the throats of audiences they’re bound to get bored eventually.

In my mind: Why haven’t the Hulk films managed to smash their way past mediocrity?

The Incredible Hulk

Say what you want but 2003’s Ang Lee Hulk was a big disappointment. Starring Eric Bana as troubled scientist Bruce Banner Whilst Lee was able to successfully tap into the issues in the story of the Hulk, the film fell flat over depending on bad CGI and action films. Perhaps that’s why the franchise rebooted in 2008 with The Incredible Hulk directed by Louis Leterrier. Despite having better CGI and action than it’s predecessor, the film never explored into what made the character of Bruce Banner and the project literally became a smash and crash film. That’s why whilst I’m sad for Ed Norton at how Marvel have treated him recently by dropping him for the Avengers, I’m excited to see what actor Mark Ruffalo gives us for the angry green giant.

The next time we will see the Hulk will be in the 2012 superhero team up the Avengers. Sure that only gives Ruffalo one year to successfully take on the character of Bruce Banner, but by learning what worked and what didn’t from the previous Hulk films, it might not be as hard as it seems. What makes the Hulk such a great character is that he’s technically what every nerd in the country would love to be. One the one side you have this genius weedy scientist Bruce Banner, but on the other side you have his alter-ego who’s capable of giving any bad guy a taste of their own medicine.

It’s time we got a Hulk where there’s an equal balance between the struggle of Bruce Banner and the ferocity of the Hulk. What the previous films have forgotten is that the Hulk is meant to be a hero. So far we’ve only seen snippets of the Hulk’s heroism, but what made the comics so successfully is that the Hulk was cool. He wasn’t always mindlessly rampaging across the world, instead becoming a hero and joining the Avengers team. The recent animated television show: Avengers: Earth’s Mightiest Heroes captured the Hulk perfectly in my opinion. It maintained his dominance and moodyness, but also explored how fun and humorous the character can be.

Whilst early rumours indicate the Hulk simply may be a puppet of Asgardian villain Loki in the Avengers film meaning we might not get an accurate portrayal of Bruce Banner for a while, whoever it is playing the role of Banner needs to give us the portrayal we’ve been waiting for.

And then I’m sure Hulk will smash; after all you don’t want to make him angry.

I’m thinking: Could DC reveal a cinematic universe already in existence?

Super Powers  Birthday Card

Image by roadkillbuddha via Flickr

It’s generally thought that DC likes to keep their properties in their own stand-alone worlds, but what if they have been planning a shared cinematic universe all along?

With DC finally upping their game, we have three new movies due in Green Lantern, The Dark Knight Rises and Superman: The Man of Steel. It’s been made pretty clear that Christopher Nolan‘s Batman universe exists on its own, but would it really be that hard to include it in a future cinematic universe.

For me it rests in the balance on whether or not Marvel’s Avengers does well. If it does then I wouldn’t be too surprised if DC pushed forward with a Justice League movie. After all, their existing universe wouldn’t have to apply to just film. The upcoming Wonder Woman television show could be included, and the rest of the set up can be done in the future Flash and Aquaman films. (Or maybe a TV series for Aquaman. He’s not that loved it seems.). They could even reference how Batman was unaware of other heroes, as he remained isolated in Gotham City. Sure it might seem a bit lazy to suddenly include Nolan’s Bat universe but it would get the ball rolling for a justice league movie a hell of a lot quicker.

The Justice League in my opinion would blow The Avengers out of the water. Batman, Superman and Green Lantern make for a much more interesting trio than Captain America, Thor and Iron Man. Plus, at sneaky as this, DC can learn from Marvel’s mistakes and only include brief references to the cinematic universe in their films rather than run the risk of turning their properties into congested trailers for the Justice League movie. (Iron Man 2 style.) Whilst Nolan has confirmed The Dark Knight Rises wraps up his trilogy, he hasn’t said if it’s the end of Christian Bale‘s run as the caped crusader. Perhaps Rises will just be about Batman redeeming himself, ready to serve as a hero in The Justice League.

I’m for one definitely up for DC to announce an already existing cinematic universe. It’s sneaky but it moves things along a lot quicker. I’m twenty years old already. By the time Batman and Green Lantern were rebooted as well as releasing The Flash and Aquaman films, I probably wouldn’t see The Justice League until I’m way into my thirties.

Make it happen DC.

I’m thinking: What happens if Captain America flops?

Cap America!

Image by TheCX via Flickr

After seeing some early reviews for Thor, as I predicted it looks like Marvel is off to an early winner. What’s happened now is that Thor has set quite a high bar for Captain America: The First Avenger to reach.

But what if it doesn’t?

Captain America is a hard property to sell to international audiences. Even Marvel has realised this by changing the films title to ‘The First Avenger’ in some countries such as Russia and Ukraine. If done wrong, the Captain America movie will come off as a cheesy form of American propaganda.  If this happens then movie will likely flop worldwide.

Captain America’s difficulty selling itself to international audiences isn’t the only problem the movie is facing. Captain America is due for release on the 29th July 2011. By then, three comic book movie blockbusters would have come and gone. Thor is almost certain to get a good turn out, the X-Men movies have a solid fan base and Green Lantern has one of the world’s biggest film studios behind it. Plus what will probably be the years biggest movie: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is released two weeks before Captain America: The First Avenger. The movie is clearly facing a huge fight already.

If the movie does flop it will likely affect plans for the 2012 superhero team up The Avengers in a big way. If box office return shows there isn’t a big audience for the character Captain America, then we will likely see some big changes in Marvel’s marketing for The Avengers film. There will probably be more emphasis on Iron Man than the rest of the team. I wouldn’t be too surprised if they changed the name of the film to Iron Man and The Avengers. There could even be some re-shoots/edits to The Avengers, which perhaps affect Cap’s role in the film. Iron Man would almost certainly be the leader on the team on screen, whilst Cap will likely be bumped to supporting role.

It could also affect plans for a Cap sequel. After all The Incredible Hulk (2008) only had a lukewarm reception/box office return and plans for a Hulk sequel have been scrapped already. The fallout from The Incredible Hulk also led to Ed Norton being bumped from his role as Bruce Banner in favour of Mark Ruffalo for next year’s Avengers movie. Could a similar thing happen to Chris Evans if the Captain America film flops?

After all, Marvel has a history of replacing actors in sequels,

Just ask Terrence Howard.